Agency AI policy library
TrueCMS's AI policy, read and compared
A Drupal and GovCMS agency aligned to Australian Government AI guidance: the CTO owns an AI use-case register, and AI-assisted code gets licence checks.
“We tell clients when AI contributes materially to deliverables, explain the role it played, and identify the human review and sign-off process.”Read the policy on truecms.au
- Agency
- Web and digital agency
- Country
- Australia
- Published as
- policy page
- Policy date
- April 28, 2026
- Tells clients
- Tells clients up front
- Read in full
- October 30, 2026
What it commits to, in its own words
6 of the 8 commitments the library compares. Each is ticked only because the policy states it as TrueCMS's own practice; the words under it are quoted from the policy.
- Human review
- “Every AI-assisted output that changes code, content, analysis, advice, or client deliverables must be reviewed by an appropriately skilled person before release.”
- Tells clients up front
- “We tell clients when AI contributes materially to deliverables, explain the role it played, and identify the human review and sign-off process.”
- When AI shapes the work: how other agencies word it
- Client data rule
- “We avoid entering personal, confidential, commercially sensitive, privileged, or secret material into public AI services.”
- Says what AI never does
- “Prohibited uses include uploading secrets or unapproved personal data to public tools, bypassing security review, deploying autonomous production changes without approval gates, impersonating humans, or using AI to make high-impact decisions without prior assessment and approval.”
- Ownership and originality
- “AI-assisted contributions are reviewed for licence compatibility, attribution needs, copied code, and client IP obligations before release.”
- Named owner
- “The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) owns AI governance, maintains the AI system and use case register, and reports material risks or incidents to the leadership team.”
Not stated in the policy as we read it
- Client can limit AI. Clients can limit or exclude AI on their work, or the agency follows the client's own AI rules.
- Names its tools. Names the specific AI tools the agency uses or has approved.
Policies to read next
- 4SiteWeb and digital agency · 7 of 8 commitmentsStaff rules: novel AI uses need leadership sign-off, AI note-takers are announced aloud on calls, and client source data needs explicit approval first.
- Rouge MediaWeb and digital agency · 8 of 8 commitmentsLogs every AI use on a client project, needs the client's written agreement, names a policy lead, and keeps an approved-tool list.
- Mangrove WebWeb and digital agency · 6 of 8 commitmentsB Corp web studio: discloses ChatGPT helped write the policy, logs AI use in project records, weighs environmental cost, follows RGD ethics on AI.
- BuiltByGoWeb and digital agency · 6 of 8 commitmentsDevelopment agency naming Claude, Claude Code and DeepSeek; AI tools are client-approved sub-processors, production data anonymised first, read-only AI credentials, opt-out via SOW.
From TrueCMS?
If the policy has changed or we misread it, write to hello@bigpipe.agency and we will read it again and update this page. To point clients or prospects to how your policy compares, link to this page:
https://bigpipe.agency/agency-ai-policies/truecms<a href="https://bigpipe.agency/agency-ai-policies/truecms">Our AI policy in the agency AI policy library</a>Read on October 30, 2026 from truecms.au/about/policies/ai-policy/. The quoted words belong to TrueCMS and are quoted to show what its policy says; our coding is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page. How we chose and coded the policies: the agency AI policy library.